Who won the 14:25 Sandown on 4 July 2026?
Indalo (IRE) won the 14:25 Sandown at SP 3.25. Ridden by Ray Dawson. Trained by Roger Varian.
← All racecards14:25
Sandown
Great BritainCoral Challenge (Handicap)
Saturday, 4 July 2026
1m·Flat·Class 2·Good To Firm·14 runners·£61,152
Result
AI top pick placed 2ndRace report
- 1stIndalo (IRE)Ray Dawson·Roger Varian9/4F·3.25SP
- 2ndHard Endeavor (FR)AI top pick · 69.0Billy Loughnane·Jane Chapple-Hyam·beaten .5 lengths7/1·8.00SP
- 3rdEbt's Guard (GB)Lewis Edmunds·William Muir & Chris Grassick·beaten 1.5 lengths8/1·9.00SP
Race time
1m 40.72s+0.22s vs std
On standard — typical pace for the course/distance.
Settled · 1pt level stake = 7.00 pt return on the winnerTipping P&L →
Furlong's verdict
Reading the form…
AI-written, grounded in our data on this race. May be wrong. Verify before staking. Opinion, not advice.
Selections by model
Head-to-head dashboard →v1.069.0/100 rating
Hard Endeavor
15.00Bet365· informational only
Top-rated, but filter rejects this race
v1.1
No pick
Race outside the segment-edge filter
Each-way68.8/100 rating
Beagle Bay
7.20Betfair Exchange
Top-half AI rating in the EW price sweet spot. Each-way splits stake: half on the win, half on the place portion.
Racing Alpha pick
Hard Endeavor
Billy Loughnane · Jane Chapple-Hyam · 4yo
69.0/100
+0.2 vs next best (68.8)
The Racing Alpha rating combines four signals. Below is the breakdown — components driving this pick first.
- Freshness10% weight100very strong21d since last run (race-fit window)
- Trainer20% weight95very strongJane Chapple-Hyam: 5/13 winners last 14d (38%)
- Ratings50% weight65averageOR 97
- Form20% weight38below averageLast 6: 3-1-5-0-4
MarketBest price 15.00 (Bet365) — 7th pick of 17 in market. AI is contrarian here.
v1.3 rating · weights and method explained on /about. Tips are opinions, not advice.
Runners
| Pos | # | Dr | Horse | Jockey / Trainer | Form | Wt | OR | RPR | TS | AI | SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1 | 10 | 6yo · G · bpFT P | 41548 | 9-12 | 110 | — | — | 59.2 | 18/1·19.00 SP | |
| 3 | 3 | 4 | 5yo · G · b | 24044 | 9-06 | 104 | — | — | 64.8 | 8/1·9.00 SP | |
| 13 | 4 | 15 | 4yo · G · b | 22330 | 9-05 | 103 | — | — | 60.6 | 14/1·15.00 SP | |
| 11 | 5 | 16 | 5yo · G · b | 00376 | 9-05 | 103 | — | — | 52.9 | 50/1·51.00 SP | |
| 8 | 6 | 5 | 6yo · G · b | 28219 | 9-01 | 99 | — | — | 57.2 | 7/1·8.00 SP | |
| 1 | 7 | 3 | 5yo · G · grh | 41223 | 9-01 | 99 | — | — | 64.5 | 9/4F·3.25 SP | |
| 14 | 8 | 14 | 5yo · G · b | 48008 | 9-01 | 99 | — | — | 53.5 | 25/1·26.00 SP | |
| 4 | 9 | 11 | 8yo · G · gr | 122704 | 8-13 | 97 | — | — | 56.1 | 50/1·51.00 SP | |
| 2 | 10 | 9 | 4yo · C · ch | 31504 | 8-13 | 97 | — | — | 69.0 | 7/1·8.00 SP | |
| 7 | 12 | 13 | 4yo · G · btFT T | 61630 | 8-10 | 94 | — | — | 54.3 | 12/1·13.00 SP | |
| 9 | 13 | 6 | 7yo · G · ch | 31007 | 8-10 | 94 | — | — | 53.3 | 20/1·21.00 SP | |
| 6 | 15 | 7 | 5yo · G · bt | 10733 | 8-09 | 93 | — | — | 62.1 | 4/1·5.00 SP | |
| 12 | 16 | 8 | 3yo · G · b | 22306 | 8-09 | 102 | — | — | 50.9 | 25/1·26.00 SP | |
| 10 | 17 | 1 | 4yo · C · ch | 13941 | 8-08 | 92 | — | — | 55.9 | 25/1·26.00 SP | |
| — | — | 17 | 5yo · G · b | 03425 | 9-07 | 105 | — | — | 62.1 | — | |
| — | — | 2 | 4yo · G · b | 31215 | 8-11 | 95 | — | — | 59.6 | — | |
| — | — | 12 | 4yo · G · b | 21411 | 8-10 | 94 | — | — | 68.8 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Did the Racing Alpha AI tip win the 14:25 Sandown?
No — the AI top pick (Hard Endeavor) finished 2.
What were the placings in the 14:25 Sandown?
Top finishers: 1. Indalo (IRE) (3.25), 2. Hard Endeavor (FR) (8.00), 3. Ebt's Guard (GB) (9.00).
What was the winning time for the 14:25 Sandown?
The winning time was 1m 40.72s, on standard time.
Racing Post verdict
Third-partyThis looks a red-hot handicap, but TRIBAL CHIEF, our selection, gets the vote for finishing full of running over an inadequate trip last time, after which he was denied a clear passage and left with too much to do; he's proven he handles quick ground before and the step back up to today's longer trip should suit ideally. Indalo, who overcame a testing draw bias last time to book a leading position in another red-hot field, rates the most obvious danger and looks sure to confirm that effort, while progressive types River King and City Of Poets, both operating from workable marks, City Of Poets for a yard in good form, also demand plenty of respect. It's desperately competitive, but TRIBAL CHIEF's stamina for this longer trip and general progress edge it for us.
Racing Post pick: Tribal Chief
Editorial verdict from Racing Post via the Racing API — not generated by Racing Alpha.
Best price shown is the highest decimal price across bookmakers we track. Odds update every few minutes; settle at SP if unavailable. 18+ only · Bet responsibly · BeGambleAware.org